data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04f09/04f0913ad5080fcca43df18b02817b6dc8403dd6" alt=""
18 February 2025
KEFI Gold and Copper plc
("KEFI" or the "Company")
Substantial Increases to Mineral Resource Estimates at Hawiah Project
Total Combined Hawiah Project Mineral Resources increased by 26% to 38.2Mt,
including 14.7Mt in Open-Pit Scenarios
Indicated Resources increased by 161%,
representing 85% of total Combined Hawiah Project Resources
KEFI (AIM: KEFI), the gold and copper exploration and development company focused on the Arabian-Nubian Shield, is pleased to announce an upgrade to the Mineral Resource Estimates ("MRE") at the Hawiah Copper-Gold Project ("Project"), part of the Saudi Arabian joint-venture Gold and Minerals Company Limited ("GMCO").
Highlights
· | Substantial increases and upgrading of the Mineral Resource Estimates for both the main Hawiah deposit and the nearby Al Godeyer deposit. | |
· | Hawiah Mineral Resource Estimate has increased by 25% or 7.3 million tonnes ("Mt") to 36.2 Mt at 0.82% copper, 0.85% zinc, 0.64g/t gold and 10.0g/t silver, representing a tonnage increase of 25%. Total contained metal is now: | |
| | |
o | 297,000 tonnes of copper (up 16% from 258,000 tonnes); | |
o | 310,000 tonnes of zinc (up 14% from 272,000 tonnes); | |
o | 745,000 ounces of gold (up 20% from 620,000 ounces); and | |
o | 11.6 million ounces of silver (up 23% from 9.4 million ounces). | |
| | |
· | Hawiah Indicated Resource increased to 30.5Mt (up 146% from 12.4Mt) and upgraded to 85% of the total Hawiah Resource. | |
· | Hawiah Resources reporting to the Open-Pit Scenario have increased to 12.7Mt (up 14% from 11.1Mt) and all in the Indicated Category, reaffirming the potential for an initial open-pit mining operation and a lower start-up capital requirement. | |
· | Al Godeyer Mineral Resource Estimate has increased by 0.65Mt to 2.0Mt at 0.93% copper, 0.53% zinc, 1.21g/t gold and 7.4g/t silver, representing a tonnage increase of 48% and all in the Indicated Category. | |
· | Resources for the Hawiah Copper-Gold Project now total 38.2Mt, of which 14.7Mt report to Open-Pit Scenarios. | |
The recently granted Umm Hijlan Exploration Licence ("EL"), adjoining the original Hawiah EL which hosts the MRE reported herein, has already been demonstrated to contain the southern strike continuation of the main Hawiah volcanic massive sulphide ("VMS") system. The Umm Hijlan EL consolidates a 210km2 strategic licence area for GMCO and offers the prospect of adding significant additional oxide and sulphide resources.
Overall, the results of the updated MRE , combined with the prospectivity of the expanded licence holdings, provide a solid foundation for long-term development planning for what was already the third largest base metals development project in Saudi Arabia.
KEFI Executive Chairman, Harry Anagnostaras-Adams, commented:
"The updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Hawiah Copper-Gold Project has provided the firm basis for a long-life mine with potential for lower cost open-pit development during the early years of the Project.
"With 85% (32Mt) of the Project's Mineral Resources now in the Indicated Resource category, further work is likely to define substantial Ore Reserves for a robust operation.
"Planned drilling of the recently granted Umm Hijlan EL is targeted to quickly define further nearby resources along strike of the Hawiah MRE. This is anticipated to commence in Q2 2025.
"KEFI is continuing to progress the strategic review of its GMCO holding, which we are targeting to be resolved in tandem with the launch of Tulu Kapi. KEFI has made it clear that the priority for its capital is to now optimise shareholder value via majority-owned projects."
Updated Hawiah MRE
GMCO appointed The MSA Group (Pty) Ltd ("MSA") as the Independent Consultants and Competent Person to prepare updated MREs for Hawiah and Al Godeyer in accordance with the Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ("JORC Code 2012"). The Hawiah and Al Godeyer MREs were recently signed off by MSA and then reviewed by GMCO and KEFI.
The updated MRE for the Hawiah deposit is detailed in Table 1 below and now totals:
- 36.2 Mt at 0.82% copper, 0.86% zinc, 0.64g/t gold and 10.0g/t silver.
Resources are classified as:
- Indicated - Open Pit - 12.7Mt at 0.85% copper, 0.83% zinc, 0.81g/t gold and 10.8g/t silver
- Indicated - Underground - 17.8Mt at 0.85% copper, 0.91% zinc, 0.56g/t gold and 9.9g/t silver
- Inferred - Open Pit - 0.01Mt at 1.18% copper, 1.14% zinc, 0.65g/t gold and 9.6g/t silver
- Inferred - Underground - 5.7 Mt at 0.69% copper, 0.74% zinc, 0.51g/t gold and 8.4g/t silver
Based on this MRE, the Hawiah deposit is estimated to contain a total of 297,000 tonnes of copper, 310,000 tonnes of zinc, 745,000 gold ounces and 11.6 million silver ounces.
Table 1 - Hawiah Mineral Resource as at 09 January 2025
Class | Mining | Material | Tonnes | Grade | Metal Content | ||||||
Cu | Zn | Au | Ag | Cu | Zn | Au | Ag | ||||
Indicated | Open Pit | Oxide | 1.2 | - | - | 2.11 | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 313 |
Transition | 2.9 | 1.22 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 13.0 | 36 | 21 | 68 | 1217 | ||
Fresh | 8.5 | 0.84 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 10.4 | 72 | 84 | 179 | 2862 | ||
Underground | Oxide | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Transition | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Fresh | 17.8 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.56 | 9.9 | 151 | 162 | 322 | 5651 | ||
Inferred | Open Pit | Oxide | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Transition | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Fresh | 0.01 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 0.65 | 9.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 3.4 | ||
Underground | Oxide | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Transition | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Fresh | 5.7 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 8.4 | 39 | 42 | 93 | 1543 | ||
Total Indicated | Open Pit | 12.7 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 10.8 | 107 | 105 | 330 | 4392 | |
Underground | 17.8 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.56 | 9.9 | 151 | 162 | 322 | 5651 | ||
All | 30.5 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 10.3 | 258 | 267 | 652 | 10043 | ||
Total Inferred | Open Pit | 0.01 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 0.65 | 9.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 3.4 | |
Underground | 5.7 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 8.4 | 39 | 42 | 93 | 1543 | ||
All | 5.7 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 8.4 | 39 | 42 | 93 | 1546 | ||
Total Mineral Resource | Open Pit | 12.7 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 10.8 | 107 | 105 | 330 | 4395 | |
Underground | 23.5 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.55 | 9.5 | 190 | 204 | 415 | 7194 | ||
All | 36.2 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 10.0 | 297 | 310 | 745 | 11589 |
Notes:
1. koz = one thousand ounces, kt = one thousand metric tonnes, Mt = one million metric tonnes.
2. All tabulated data have been rounded and as a result minor computational errors may occur.
3. Mineral Resources, which are not Mineral Reserves, have no demonstrated economic viability.
4. The Gross Mineral Resource for the Project is reported.
5. The Mineral Resource is reported in accordance with the guidelines of the 2012 Edition of The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ('the JORC Code').
6. A Whittle optimised pit shell was used to report open-pit Mineral Resources and a mineable shape optimisation (MSO) was completed for underground Mineral Resources outside the open-pit shell. The Whittle, MSO and cut-off grades were derived using the following assumed technical parameters:
No Oxide and Transition mined underground.
Pit slope angle: Fresh 53°, Transition and Oxide: 42°.
Dilution included in regularised block model (5 mX by 5 mY by 2.5 mZ) for open pit.
A minimum stope width of 2 m, and 0.2m dilution applied for underground.
Concentrator Recovery: Cu & Zn 90% in transitional and fresh; Au 84% in oxide and 74% in fresh; Ag 15% in oxide and 83% in transitional and fresh. No recovery of zinc and copper in oxide. Metallurgical factors based on initial metallurgical test-work.
Cost and revenue assumptions:
Metal Price: Cu 9350 USD/t, Zn 3300 USD/t, Au 2300 USD/oz, Ag 30 USD/oz.
Smelter recovery/payability: Cu concentrate - Cu 96.5%, Au 90%, Ag 90%. Zn concentrate - Zn 83.5%. Au Dore - Au 99.5%, Ag 99.6%.
Total mining cost: open pit oxide 2.2 USD/t, open pit transition and fresh 2.4 USD/t, underground 30.0 USD/t. Cost adjustment for open-pit depth USD 0.004/ vertical m.
Total Processing cost: oxide 13.86 USD/t, transition and fresh 21.4 USD/t.
Rehandling: 0.70 USD/t
G&A: 5.6 USD/t ore.
7. The cut-off grade was applied on a NSR basis: underground fresh ore 57.7 USD/t, open-pit transitional and fresh ore 27.7 USD/t, open-pit oxide ore 20.16 USD/t. NSR was calculated for each block model cell using the following formulae:
Oxide = (Cu %*0)+(Zn%*0)+(Au g/t 61.7895 )+(Ag g/t*0.1409)
Transition and Fresh = (Cu %*76.5870)+(Zn%*20.1118)+(Au g/t *54.4336)+(Ag g/t*0.7797).
Hawiah MRE Comparison
The previous (12 December 2022) Hawiah MRE totalled 29.0 Mt at 0.89% copper, 0.94% zinc, 0.67 g/t gold and 10.1 g/t silver.
The updated Hawiah MRE represents a significant increase in tonnage from 29.0Mt to 36.2Mt and small decreases in grades to 0.82% copper to 0.86% zinc, 0.64g/t gold and 10.0 g/t silver. The additional resource tonnage is largely driven by the expansion of Crossroads Extension Lode at depth.
Hawiah Open Pit Indicated Resources have increased by 3.5Mt to 12.7Mt. This continues to demonstrate a robust case for a lower cost open-pit development during the early years of the Project, further strengthening the economic case.
Updated Al Godeyer MRE
The updated MRE for the Al Godeyer deposit is detailed in Table 2 below and now totals:
- 2.0 Mt at 0.93% copper, 0.53% zinc, 1.21g/t gold and 7.4g/t silver,
and 94% of the MRE is now in the Indicated Resource category (previously all in the Inferred Resource category).
Based on this MRE, the Al Godeyer deposit is estimated to contain a total of 18,500 tonnes of copper, 10,600 tonnes of zinc, 77,900 gold ounces and 0.5 million silver ounces.
Table 2 - Al Godeyer Mineral Resource as at 09 December 2024
Class | Mining Type | Material Type | Tonnes (Mt) | Grade | Metal Content | ||||||
Cu | Zn | Au | Ag | Cu | Zn | Au | Ag | ||||
Indicated | Open Pit | Oxide | 0.28 | - | - | 1.48 | 1.38 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.4 | 12.9 |
Transition | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.22 | 0.91 | 6.88 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 49.3 | ||
Fresh | 1.38 | 1.12 | 0.65 | 1.19 | 8.28 | 15.4 | 8.9 | 52.7 | 366.4 | ||
Total Indicated |
| All | 1.88 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 7.08 | 17.0 | 9.4 | 72.6 | 428.2 |
Inferred | Open Pit | Oxide | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Transition | 0.00 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Fresh | 0.12 | 1.36 | 1.10 | 1.42 | 12.17 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 45.3 | ||
Total Inferred |
| All | 0.12 | 1.36 | 1.10 | 1.42 | 12.17 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 45.3 |
Total Resource |
| All | 2.00 | 0.93 | 0.53 | 1.21 | 7.37 | 18.5 | 10.6 | 77.9 | 473.8 |
Notes:
1. koz = one thousand ounces, kt = one thousand metric tonnes, Mt = one million metric tonnes.
2. All tabulated data have been rounded and as a result minor computational errors may occur.
3. Mineral Resources, which are not Mineral Reserves, have no demonstrated economic viability.
4. The Gross Mineral Resource for the Project is reported.
5. The Mineral Resource is reported in accordance with the guidelines of the 2012 Edition of The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" ('the JORC Code').
6. A Whittle optimised pit shell was used to report open-pit Mineral Resources. The Whittle optimisation was based on the following assumed technical parameters:
Pit slope angle: Fresh 56°, Transition 51° and Oxide: 44°.
Dilution of 10% and mining recovery of 95%
Concentrator Recovery: Cu 90%, Zn 90%, Au 85%, Ag 60% No recovery of zinc and copper in oxide. Metallurgical factors based on initial metallurgical test-work.
Cost and revenue assumptions:
Metal Price: Cu 9,350 USD/t, Zn 3,300 USD/t, Au 2,300 USD/oz, Ag 30 USD/oz.
Smelter recovery/payability: Cu 96.5%, Zn 83.5%. Au Dore - Au 99.5%, Ag 99.6%.
Mining cost: open pit oxide 2.2 USD/t, open pit transition and fresh 2.4 USD/t. Transport to Hawiah plant 1.125 USD/t and rehandling cost of 0.7 USD/t. Cost adjustment for open-pit depth USD 0.004 / vertical m.
Total Processing cost: oxide 13.9 USD/t, transition and fresh 21.4 USD/t.
G&A: 5.6 USD/t ore.
7. The cut-off grade was applied on a net smelter return (NSR) basis: open-pit transition and fresh ore 31.2 USD/t, open-pit oxide ore 23.5 USD/t. NSR was calculated for each block model cell using the following formulae:
Oxide = (Cu %*0)+(Zn%*0)+(Au g/t*62.5251 )+(Ag g/t*0.5637)
Transition and Fresh = (Cu %*76.5870)+(Zn%*20.1118)+(Au g/t *62.5251)+(Ag g/t*0.5637).
Al Godeyer MRE Comparison
The previous (27 March 2023) Al Godeyer MRE totalled 1.35Mt at 0.6% copper, 0.54% zinc, 1.4g/t gold and 6.6g/t silver (all in the Inferred category).
Infill drilling allowed better definition of the high-grade zone in the core of the deposit and high-grade copper intersections enhanced the fresh zone copper grade.
The updated Al Godeyer MRE represents a 0.65Mt increase in tonnage from 1.35Mt to 2.0Mt. The additional resource tonnage is largely driven by further drilling extending the resource. The average resource grades are similar except for the copper grade increasing 55% to 0.93% copper, due to the increased ratio of Fresh Mineral Resources to Oxide Mineral Resources (for which copper is not reported) and additional drillholes confirming the higher grade central area.
Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Disclosure
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 ("MAR"), and is disclosed in accordance with the Company's obligations under Article 17 of MAR.
KEFI Gold and Copper plc |
|
Harry Anagnostaras-Adams (Executive Chairman) | +357 99457843 |
John Leach (Finance Director) | +357 99208130 |
| |
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Nominated Adviser) | +44 (0) 20 3470 0470 |
Jeff Keating, Adam Cowl | |
| |
Tavira Financial Limited (Lead Broker) | +44 (0) 20 7100 5100 |
Oliver Stansfield, Jonathan Evans | |
| |
IFC Advisory Ltd (Financial PR and IR) | +44 (0) 20 3934 6630 |
Tim Metcalfe, Florence Chandler | |
| |
3PPB LLC (Institutional IR) | |
Patrick Chidley | +1 (917) 991 7701 |
Paul Durham | +1-203-940-2538 |
Competent Person Statement
The Hawiah and Al Godeyer Mineral Resource estimates were completed by Mr. Jeremy Charles Witley (BSc Hons, MSc (Eng.)) who is a geologist with 36 years' experience in base and precious metals exploration and mining as well as Mineral Resource evaluation and reporting. He is a Principal Mineral Resource Consultant for The MSA Group (an independent consulting company). He is registered with the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions ("SACNASP"), is a Fellow of the Geological Society of South Africa ("GSSA") and a Fellow of the Professional Society of Independent Experts of the Subsurface Resources ("PONEN"), Kazakhstan. Mr. Witley has the appropriate relevant qualifications and experience to be considered a "Competent Person" as defined by JORC (2012) for the style and type of mineralisation and activity being undertaken. Mr Witley consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results and geological interpretaion is based on information compiled by Mr Tomos Bryan for GMCO. Mr Bryan is a member of the AusIMM. Mr Bryan is a geologist with sufficient relevant experience for Company reporting to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012. Mr Bryan consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
Notes to Editor
KEFI Gold and Copper plc
KEFI is focused primarily on the development of the Tulu Kapi Gold Project in Ethiopia and its pipeline of highly prospective exploration projects in the Arabian-Nubian Shield. KEFI targets that production at Tulu Kapi will generate cash flows for capital repayments, further exploration and dividends to shareholders.
Appendix A - Glossary of Technical Terms
Ag | Silver |
AAS | Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy |
Arabian-Nubian Shield or ANS | The Arabian-Nubian Shield is a large area of Precambrian rocks in various countries surrounding the Red Sea |
ARTAR | Abdul Rahman Saad Al Rashid & Sons Company Limited |
Au | Gold |
CRM | Certified reference material |
Cu | Copper |
DFS | Definitive Feasibility Study |
g/t | Grams per tonne |
Gossan | An iron-bearing weathered product overlying a sulphide deposit |
ICP-AES | Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy |
IDW | Inverse Distance Weighted |
IP | Induced polarisation - a ground-based geophysical survey technique measuring the intensity of an induced electric current, used to identify disseminated sulphide deposits |
JORC | Joint Ore Reserves Committee |
JORC Code 2012 | Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves |
m | Metres |
Massive sulphide | Rock comprised of more than 40% sulphide minerals |
Mt | Million tonnes |
Mtpa | Million tonnes per annum |
MRE | Mineral Resource Estimate |
NSR | Net Smelter Return |
oz | Troy ounce of gold |
PEA | Preliminary Economic Assessment |
PFS | Pre-Feasibility Study |
PPM | Parts per million |
Precambrian | Era of geological time before the Cambrian, from approximately 4,600 to 542 million years ago |
QAQC | Quality Assurance and Quality Control |
VMS deposits | Volcanogenic massive sulphides; refers to massive sulphide deposits formed in a volcanic environment on or near the sea floor with varying base metals (copper, lead and zinc) often with significant additional gold and silver |
Zn | Zinc |
APPENDIX B
Additional Background information on the Hawiah VMS deposit and MRE
The Hawiah deposit is located within the Wadi Bidah Mineral Belt ("WBMB") in the southwest of the Arabian Shield. The WBMD is a 120-kilometre-long belt which hosts over 20 Volcanic Massive Sulphide ("VMS") known occurrences and historic workings for copper and gold.
GMCO commenced drilling at Hawiah in September 2019 and quickly confirmed that large-scale VMS style of mineralisation underlies the gossanous ridgeline at surface.
A total of 375 diamond drillholes, 114 reverse circulation drillholes and 56 trenches have been used for this Mineral Resource Estimate.
Mineralisation modelled comprises a continuous subvertical tabular layer for approximately 4.5km along north to south strike at outcrop. Localised minor pinch outs occur, which are not significant. Two major zones (lodes) of down-dip extent have been defined (the Camp Lode in the south and the Crossroads Lode in the north) which plunge approximately 25° to the south for 1.7km (Camp) and 1.8km (Crossroads) to approximately 740m vertical depth below surface.
The mineralised layer normally has a thickness of between 1m and 15m and thins towards the edges of the lodes. The central portions of the deposit between the main lodes extends vertically to between 100m and 200m.
Summary of Resource Estimate Parameters and Reporting Criteria
In accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition), a summary of the material information used to estimate the Mineral Resource is detailed below (for further information please refer to Table 1 in Appendix D).
Geology and Geological Interpretation
The Hawiah VMS deposit is located on the eastern limb of a regional-scale antiform in within the locally know, 'Group 2' mafic volcanics of the Wadi Bidah Mineral Belt.
The Hawiah deposit forms a prominent north-south trending ridgeline, exposed over a total length of approximately 4,500m with a thickness that varies from 1-15m. The ridge has been interpreted by GMCO as the modern-day expression of the original VMS palaeohorizon. The rock package comprises a suite of gossanous ex-massive sulphides, chert breccias, banded ironstones and intermediate volcanic breccias. The deposit has been subject to varying degrees of supergene alteration as a result of groundwater interactions.
The deposit comprises of four weathering/alteration domains: oxide, oxide/transitional, transitional and fresh. The oxide domain typically shows supergene gold enrichment, while portions of the transitional domain shows copper enrichment. The fresh mineralised domain appears to be a dominantly pyritic stratiform massive sulphide body.
The oxide mineralisation transitions from an oxide zone to a tabular massive sulphide deposit at between 40 m and 80 m below surface with localised areas of deeper oxidation. The deposit strikes from north to south and generally dips from vertically to 80° towards the east with local areas that are steeply dipping towards the west. The massive sulphide dominantly comprises fine grained pyrite, which has sharp contacts with the greenschist which forms the hangingwall and footwall.
Sampling Techniques and Hole Spacing
A total of 375 diamond drillholes, 114 reverse circulation drillholes and 56 trenches have been used for the Hawiah Mineral Resource Estimate. Drilling spans over 5km of strike length.
Drillhole spacing in the Oxide and Transition is typically 50m. Spacing within the Fresh domain is typically 30-80m (Indicated classification) and approximately 120m (Inferred classification).
Drillholes were logged for a combination of geological and geotechnical attributes. The core has been photographed and measured for RQD and core recovery.
Sampling and Sub-Sampling Techniques
Diamond drilling and surface trenching was used to obtain sample intervals that typically range from 0.3-3m for drilling, 1-3m for reverse circulation drilling and trenching.
Whole diamond core was split using a core saw by GMCO personnel and then submitted for preparation at ALS Arabia (Jeddah), during which material was crushed to 2mm, pulverised to ~75µm, with 250g split sent for analysis. The sample preparation procedures used for reverse circulation and trench samples is consistent with the drillcore samples.
The mineralised interval for all sample types was continuously sampled from hangingwall to footwall, which included samples a short distance into the hangingwall and footwall.
Sampling Analysis Method
Samples have undergone analysis at the ALS Laboratory, located in Jeddah., Saudi Arabia.
- Gold - Fire assay digest with AAS instrumentation
- Copper, Zinc, Silver: Four acid digest ICP-AES
QAQC
QAQC procedures include:
- Insertion of CRM standards, certified blanks, and field duplicates at rate of 15%;
- Monthly internal QAQC reporting; and
- Regular communication with the laboratory, including periodical lab inspections.
Estimation Methodology
In summary, for this MRE, the following approach has been utilised:
• | modelling of the mineralised lode and weathering domains in 3D, by the GMCO geological team and reviewed and accepted by MSA; |
• | composited the sample data to 2m intervals using length and density (assigned by rock type) weighting; |
• | applied high-grade caps per estimation domain from log histograms; |
• | undertaken geostatistical analyses to determine appropriate interpolation parameters; |
• | created a block model with parent block dimensions of 25m (strike) x 2m (across strike) x 10m (dip), sub-blocked to a minimum of 1m (strike) x 0.5m (across strike) x 1m (dip); |
• | interpolated Cu, Zn, Au and Ag grade into the block model using ordinary kriging; |
• | assigned average density values by weathering domain; and |
• | visually and statistically validated the estimated block grades relative to the original sample results. |
Classification Criteria
The Hawiah resource has been classified in the Inferred and Indicated Mineral Resource classification category, as defined by JORC 2012.
Mineral Resource Statement Parameters and Cut-off Grade
MSA has applied basic economic considerations based on initial metallurgical testwork results and assumptions provided by the Company, similar deposit types located within Saudi Arabia and MSA's experience to determine which portion of the block model has reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by underground and open-pit mining methods.
To achieve this, the Mineral Resource has been subject to an underground Mineable shape optimisation ("MSO") and open-pit optimisation studies, based on long-term metal price forecasts (with appropriate uplift to reflect potential for assessing Mineral Resources) for copper, zinc, gold and silver, to assist in determining the material with potential for underground and open pit mining and reporting above a suitable Resource Net Smelter Return ("NSR") USD/t cut-off value ("Resource NSR").
The Resource NSR cut-off calculation has been determined based on metal price forecasts, initial metallurgical recovery results and assumptions, mining costs, processing costs, general and administrative ("G&A") costs, and other NSR factors. The final Resource NSR value calculation is based on average assumptions for the deposit and applied to the block model using the following formulae:
· Resource NSR (USD) value for oxide material = (Cu%*0) + (Zn%*0) + (Au g/t*61.7895) + (Ag g/t*0.1409)
· Resource NSR (USD) value for transition and fresh material = (Cu%*76.5870) + (Zn%*20.1118) + (Au g/t*54.4336) + (Ag g/t*0.7797)
The cut-off values determined for reporting the Mineral Resource on a Resource NSR USD/t basis, are given below and were based on the technical and economic inputs presented in the table below:
- USD20.2/t for open pit material reported from within the oxide mineralisation domain;
- USD27.7/t for open pit material reported from within the transition and fresh mineralisation domains; and
- USD57.7/t for underground material reported from within the fresh mineralisation domains.
Summary of key assumptions for conceptual underground stope optimisation, open pit optimisation and cut-off grade calculation for Hawiah MRE.
Parameters | Units | |
Production Rate | ||
Production Rate - Ore | (mtpa) | 1.8 - 2.2 |
Geotechnical | ||
Overall Slope Angle (Oxide) | (Deg) | 42 |
Overall Slope Angle (Transition) | (Deg) | 42 |
Overall Slope Angle (Fresh) | (Deg) | 53 |
Open Pit Mining Factors | ||
Dilution | (%) | Included in regularised Block Model 5x5x2.5 m |
Recovery | (%) | |
Underground Mining Factors | ||
Minimum stope dimension | (m) | 2m width x 25 m height x 20 m length |
Dilution | (%) | 10% |
Processing (Oxide: Cyanide Leach) | ||
Recovery - Cu | (%) | 0% |
Recovery - Zn | (%) | 0% |
Recovery - Au | (%) | 84% |
Recovery - Ag | (%) | 15% |
Processing (Transition and Fresh: Flotation and Cyanide Leach) | ||
Recovery - Cu | (%) | 90% |
Recovery - Zn | (%) | 90% |
Recovery - Au | (%) | 74% |
Recovery - Ag | (%) | 83% |
Commodity Prices | ||
Cu | (USD/t) | 9,350 |
Zn | (USD/t) | 3,300 |
Au | (USD/oz) | 2,300 |
Ag | (USD/oz) | 30 |
Operating Costs | ||
Open Pit Mining (Oxide) | (USD/t rock) | 2.2 |
Open Pit Mining (Transition) | (USD/t rock) | 2.4 |
Open Pit Mining (Fresh) | (USD/t rock) | 2.4 |
Underground Mining (Transition and Fresh) | (USD/t ore) | 30 |
Processing (Oxide: Cyanide Leach) | (USD/t ore) | 13.9 |
Processing (Transition and Fresh: Floatation and Cyanide Leach) | (USD/t ore) | 21.4 |
G&A (incl. corporate, sales/ marketing) | (USD/t ore) | 5.6 |
Mining and Metallurgical Methods and Parameters
In determining Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction (RPEEE) the following assumptions were made:
| |
· | Open pit mining will be used for the near surface portion of the Mineral Resource. This was prioritised over the optimal changeover to underground to maximise the open-pit extraction. |
· | The remainder of the fresh Mineral Resource will be extracted using underground mining methods such as long-hole open stoping. In the central areas, and Crossroads Lode, where the block model remaining below the open pit is of limited vertical extent, it was excluded from the Mineral Resource. Oxide, oxide-transitional (treated as oxide) and transitional mineralisation was not considered for underground mining. |
· | Copper and zinc sulphides are expected to be recovered by flotation to produce concentrates containing copper, zinc, gold and silver. |
· | The gold and silver will be recovered from the oxide zone using leaching to produce Dore. No copper or zinc will be recovered from the oxide zone. |
Initial metallurgical test work has been completed for the transitional and fresh (sulphide) and oxide mineralisation at Hawiah. This test work comprised flotation and cyanide leach methods. Further test work is ongoing including Albion amenability and resin in leach testing. Once testwork is completed, if the metallurgical recovery results change significantly from the current approximated values, this would impact the parameters used to report the Mineral Resource, which, in turn, could also impact the tonnages and grades considered to have 'reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction' for reporting in the Mineral Resource Statement.
Appendix C - Diagrams for Hawiah MRE
Figure 2 - Hawiah deposit in Long Section displaying resource classification and the open pit locations
Figure 3 - Collar locations of diamond and RC drilling across the Hawiah project.
Appendix D - JORC Table 1 for Hawiah MRE
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4158X_1-2025-2-17.pdf
APPENDIX E
Additional Background information on the Al Godeyer deposit
The Al Godeyer deposit is located within the Wadi Bidah Mineral District ("WBMD") in the southwest of the Arabian Shield. The WBMD is a 120-kilometre-long belt which hosts over 20 Volcanic Massive Sulphide ("VMS") known occurrences and historic workings for copper and gold.
The Al Godeyer project is located 12km east of the Hawiah deposit which hosts a mineral resource of 36.2Mt at 0.82% copper, 0.86% zinc, 0.64 g/t gold and 10.0 g/t silver.
GMCO commenced drilling at Al Godeyer in March 2022 and quickly confirmed that the VMS style of mineralisation underlies the gossanous ridgeline at the surface.
A total of 16 diamond drillholes, 19 reverse circulation drillholes and 25 trenches have led to the definition of a copper-zinc-gold-silver massive sulphide lode that remains open at depth and along strike to the southeast. This area was underwent infill and expansion drilling to increase the Resource Classification and expand the open-pit amenable resources. This drilling comprised an additional 60 holes.
The deepest massive sulphide intersection at Al Godeyer is at a vertical depth of 200m where 3.3m true width of massive sulphide was intersected. The average true width of Al Godeyer is 4.5m with the widest intersection of 7.5m found at a depth of 20m.
Drilling spans over 1,250m of strike length at a drill spacing of approximately 50m or less for Indicated classification and 100m or less for areas reporting to Inferred classification.
Summary of Resource Estimate Parameters and Reporting Criteria
In accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition), a summary of the material information used to estimate the Mineral Resource is detailed below (for further information please refer to Table 1 in Appendix F).
Geology and Geological Interpretation
The Al Godeyer VMS deposit is located on the western limb of a regional-scale antiform within the locally known, 'Group 3' volcanoclastic and epiclastic units of the Wadi Bidah Mineral Belt.
The Al Godeyer deposit is expressed at surface by a northwest-southeast trending gossan that forms a slight ridgeline exposed over a length of approximately 1,250m, with a thickness that typically varies from 2m to 13m. The gossan outcrop strikes approximately west to east for a further 300m in the southern area, and a fault has been interpreted to explain the sudden strike change. Away from this main deposit area, the gossan horizon can be traced discontinuously along strike for an additional 800m.
The ridge has been interpreted by GMCO as the modern-day expression of the original VMS palaeohorizon with varying degrees of remobilised sulphides. The rock package comprises a suite of gossanous ex-massive sulphides, chert breccias, banded ironstones and sulphide-rich epiclastics. The deposit has been subject to varying degrees of the supergene alteration as a result of groundwater interactions.
The deposit comprises three weathering/alteration domains; Oxide, Transitional, and Fresh, within which different resulting facies are described. The oxide and transition domains typically show supergene gold enrichment and copper depletion. The fresh mineralised domain appears to be a dominantly pyritic stratiform semi-massive to massive sulphide body.
The Oxide domain mineralisation at the Al Godeyer is a combination of gossan, saccharoidal silica and haematitic cherts derived from leaching of the semi-massive to massive sulphide deposit. Higher-grade gold mineralisation is typically associated with saccharoidal silica facies, similar to the Hawiah deposit.
In the Transition domain, mineralisation is typically characterised by its dark grey to black colour due to patrial oxidation of the semi-massive to massive sulphide. The base of the transition zone is predominantly defined by the observed sulphide state, where dark grey altered sulphides become yellow un-oxidised massive pyrite at depth. Transition material is analogous to that of the Hawiah deposit albeit without a noticeable enrichment in copper.
Petrographic studies on drillcore from the Fresh domain have shown that the majority of the sulphides have undergone a degree of recrystallisation. This is in contrast to the Hawiah deposit where sulphide textures indicate the massive sulphide ore body is relatively undisturbed. The remobilisation and recrystallisation of sulphides at Al Godeyer are interpreted to have occurred due to regional metamorphism to amphibolite facies followed by retrograde metamorphism to greenschist and local emplacement of granodiorite intrusions. This remobilisation and recrystallisation have resulted in a semi-massive to massive sulphide body with between 10-60% pyrite unlike Hawiah which typically contains >80% pyrite. Due to the continuity of the mineralisation and no evidence of a feeder structure it appears the remobilisation likely occurred locally within the original paleohorizon.
The central portion of the deposit is the thickest and contains mineralisation elevated in gold, copper, zinc and silver, which extends 300m to 400m along strike and extends to at least 200m below surface. The northwest and southeast areas have not been tested below the oxide and transition domains.
Sampling Techniques and Hole Spacing
A total of 85 diamond drillholes (9,465m), 19 reverse circulation drillholes (1,169m) and 25 trenches (1,0462m) have been used for this Mineral Resource Estimate. Drillhole spacing for trenching is approximately 50m or less for Indicated classification and 100m or less for Inferred classification.
Drillholes were logged for a combination of geological and geotechnical attributes. The core has been photographed and measured for RQD and core recovery.
Sampling and Sub-Sampling Techniques
Diamond drilling and surface trenching were used to obtain sample intervals that typically range from 0.3-3m for drilling, and 1-3m for reverse circulation drilling and trenching.
The whole diamond core was split using a core saw by GMCO personnel and then submitted for preparation at ALS Jeddah, during which material was crushed to 2mm, pulverised to ~75µm, with 250g split sent for analysis. The sample preparation procedures used for reverse circulation and trench samples are consistent with the drillcore samples.
The mineralised interval for all sample types was continuously sampled from hangingwall to footwall, which included samples a short distance into the hangingwall and footwall.
Sampling Analysis Method
Samples have undergone analysis at the ALS Laboratory, located in Jeddah., Saudi Arabia.
- Gold - Fire assay digest with AAS instrumentation
- Copper, Zinc, Silver: Four acid digest ICP-AES
QAQC
QAQC procedures include:
- Insertion of CRM standards, certified blanks, and field duplicates at a rate of 15% (5% each) coupled with pulp duplicates.
- Monthly internal QAQC reporting
- Regular communication with the laboratory, including periodical lab inspections.
Estimation Methodology
In summary, for this Mineral Resource Estimate, the following approach has been utilised:
• | modelling of the mineralised lode and weathering domains in 3D by the GMCO geological team and reviewed and accepted by MSA; |
• | composited the sample data to 1m intervals using length and density (assigned by rock type) weighting; |
• | applied high-grade caps per estimation domain from outlier analysis; |
• | undertaken geostatistical analyses to determine appropriate interpolation parameters; |
• | created a block model that was rotated 49° into the dominant strike direction with parent block dimensions of 12.5m (strike) x 2m (across strike) x 5m (dip), sub-blocked to a fraction of parent cell of ¼ (strike) x ⅛ (across strike) x ¼ (dip); |
• | interpolated copper, zinc, gold and silver grades into the block model using ordinary kriging; |
• | assigned density values by weathering domain; and |
• | visually and statistically validated the estimated block grades relative to the original sample results. |
Classification Criteria
The Al Godeyer resource has been classified in the Inferred Mineral Resource classification category, as defined by JORC 2012.
Mineral Resource Statement Parameters and Cut-off Grade
MSA has applied basic economic considerations based on initial metallurgical testwork results and assumptions provided by the Company, similar deposit types located within Saudi Arabia and MSA's experience to determine which portion of the block model has reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by underground and open-pit mining methods.
To achieve this, the Mineral Resource has been subject to open-pit optimisation studies, based on long-term metal price forecasts (with appropriate uplift to reflect the potential for assessing Mineral Resources) for copper, zinc, gold and silver, to assist in determining the material with potential for underground and open pit mining and reporting above a suitable Resource Net Smelter Return ("NSR") USD/t cut-off value ("Resource NSR").
The Resource NSR cut-off calculation has been determined based on metal price forecasts, initial metallurgical recovery results and assumptions, mining costs, processing costs, general and administrative (G&A) costs, and other NSR factors. The final Resource NSR value calculation is based on average assumptions for the deposit and applied to the block model using the following formulae:
- Resource NSR (USD) value for oxide material = (Cu %*0)+(Zn%*0)+(Au g/t*62.5251 )+(Ag g/t*0.5637)
- Resource NSR (USD) value for transition and fresh material = (Cu %*76.5870)+(Zn%*20.1118)+(Au g/t *62.5251)+(Ag g/t*0.5637)
The cut-off values determined for reporting the Mineral Resource on a Resource NSR USD/t basis, are given below and were based on the technical and economic inputs presented in the table below:
- USD23.5/t for open pit material reported from within the oxide mineralisation domain;
- USD31.2/t for open pit material reported from within the transition and fresh mineralisation domains.
Summary of key assumptions for conceptual underground stope optimisation, open pit optimisation and cut-off grade calculation
Parameters | Units | |
Geotechnical | ||
Overall Slope Angle (Oxide) | (Deg) | 44 |
Overall Slope Angle (Transition) | (Deg) | 51 |
Overall Slope Angle (Fresh) | (Deg) | 56 |
Open Pit Mining Factors | ||
Dilution | (%) | 10% 95% |
Recovery | (%) | |
Processing (Oxide: Cyanide Leach) | ||
Recovery - Cu | (%) | 0% |
Recovery - Zn | (%) | 0% |
Recovery - Au | (%) | 85% |
Recovery - Ag | (%) | 60% |
Processing (Transition and Fresh: Albion Circuit and Cyanide Leach) | ||
Recovery - Cu | (%) | 90% |
Recovery - Zn | (%) | 90% |
Recovery - Au | (%) | 85% |
Recovery - Ag | (%) | 60% |
Commodity Prices | ||
Cu | (USD/t) | 9,350 |
Zn | (USD/t) | 3,300 |
Au | (USD/oz) | 2,300 |
Ag | (USD/oz) | 30 |
Operating Costs | ||
Open Pit Mining (Oxide Ore) | (USD/t rock) | 2.2 |
Open Pit Mining (Oxide Waste) | (USD/t rock) | 2.2 |
Open Pit Mining (Transition and Fresh Ore) | (USD/t rock) | 2.4 |
Open Pit Mining (Transition and Fresh Waste) | (USD/t rock) | 2.4 |
Processing (Oxide: Cyanide Leach) | (USD/t ore) | 13.9 |
Processing (Transition and Fresh: Albion Circuit Cyanide Leach) | (USD/t ore) | 21.4 |
G&A (incl. corporate, sales/ marketing) | (USD/t ore) | 5.6 |
Mining and Metallurgical Methods and Parameters
Initial metallurgical test work has been completed for the Oxide mineralisation at Al Godeyer. This test work comprised comminution, cyanide leach, thickening and filtration test work done at the South African laboratories of Mealgwyn Mineral Services (Johannesburg) and Paterson & Cooke (Cape town). Further test work which including floatation test work on Transition and Fresh Ore has commenced and will be followed by Albion Amenability testwork once the floatation test is complete. Once all testwork is completed, if the metallurgical recovery results change significantly from the current approximated values, this would impact the parameters used to report the Mineral Resource, which, in turn, could also impact the tonnages and grades considered to have 'reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction' for reporting in the Mineral Resource Statement.
Appendix F - Diagrams for Al Godeyer MRE
Figure 4 - Plan showing the Exploration Licences comprising the Hawiah Copper-Gold Project.
Figure 4 - Long section displaying resource classification and open pit shell
Figure 5 - Location of diamond and RC drillholes at Al Godeyer.
Appendix G - JORC Table 1 for Al Godeyer MRE
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4158X_2-2025-2-17.pdf
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy.